Earnout Agreements: Legal and Financial Insights

Earnout agreements are a common feature in mergers and acquisitions, tying part of the purchase price to the future performance of the acquired business. Here's what you need to know:

• What is an Earnout? It's a contract where buyers pay a portion upfront and additional payments later if specific performance targets (like revenue, EBITDA, or customer retention) are met.
• Why Use Earnouts? They bridge valuation gaps between buyers and sellers, reduce buyer risk, and motivate sellers to stay engaged post-sale.
• Legal Considerations: Clear contract terms, dispute resolution mechanisms, and adherence to good faith principles are essential to avoid conflicts.
• Financial Structure: Metrics like revenue or EBITDA must be well-defined. Payments typically span 1-5 years and can be fixed, tiered, or milestone-based.
• Tax Impacts: Payments are usually treated as capital gains for sellers and part of the purchase price for buyers, with compliance to tax laws like Section 409A.

Earnouts can be effective but require precise drafting, clear metrics, and proactive risk management to avoid disputes and ensure alignment between both parties.

Earnouts in M&A Explained – Real Life Examples and The Risks Involved

Legal Requirements for Earnout Structure

Crafting a legally sound earnout agreement demands a keen understanding of contract law and precise drafting to avoid misunderstandings. Given the complexity of these agreements, poorly defined terms can lead to disputes that erode the value of the entire deal.

Writing Clear Contract Terms

At the heart of any enforceable earnout is clear and precise language. Performance metrics like revenue or EBITDA must be defined in detail, including how calculations will be performed and the accounting standards to be used.

For example, if an earnout hinges on annual revenue exceeding $10 million, the contract should spell out the measurement period, how international sales will be converted into the agreed currency, and how one-time transactions will be treated.

To avoid disputes, include mechanisms for resolving disagreements. Many earnout agreements incorporate mandatory arbitration clauses, specifying industry-experienced arbitrators to handle disputes. Additionally, the contract should outline how financial records will be accessed and detail the seller’s obligations for ongoing reporting.

Payment terms also require exact definitions. Instead of vague phrases like "within a reasonable time", specify deadlines such as "payment within 30 days after the completion of audited financial statements", and include interest penalties for delays.

Beyond clarity, U.S. legal precedents play a key role in shaping enforceable earnout agreements.

U.S. Legal Precedents

Federal and state courts have established principles that impact how earnouts are interpreted and enforced. One critical requirement is the duty of good faith and fair dealing, which ensures buyers cannot deliberately act to prevent earnout payments. Even if a contract doesn’t explicitly address such behavior, courts expect buyers to manage the acquired business in a way that allows sellers a fair chance to meet performance targets.

For instance, courts have ruled that buyers must use their best efforts to maintain the acquired business’s operations during the earnout period. Cases have gone against buyers who, for example, slashed marketing budgets, discontinued key product lines, or reassigned vital personnel in ways that hindered earnout achievement.

Integration decisions also come under scrutiny. When buyers merge acquired companies into larger operations, courts evaluate whether the integration was commercially reasonable or an attempt to sidestep earnout obligations. Successful agreements often include provisions specifying how integration activities will be managed.

Accounting disputes are another common issue. To avoid problems, contracts should clearly state the accounting methods to be used. Courts generally favor consistent accounting practices, meaning the methods used during due diligence should remain in place throughout the earnout period unless the contract explicitly states otherwise.

Payment Acceleration and Forfeiture Rules

Earnout agreements must also address scenarios where payments might be accelerated or forfeited, ensuring both parties are protected and understand their rights in exceptional circumstances.

Change of control events are a common trigger for accelerated payments. If the buyer sells the acquired company or is itself acquired during the earnout period, the seller often receives the remaining earnout payments immediately. The contract should define how these payments will be calculated, often based on projected performance or fair market value.

Material breaches by the seller should be clearly defined to avoid disputes. For example, breaches like competing with the acquired business, soliciting its customers or employees, or breaking confidentiality agreements can lead to forfeiture of earnout rights. However, these breaches must be material and curable within a specified timeframe to prevent legal challenges.

Asset sale provisions address situations where buyers sell parts of the acquired business. Instead of automatic forfeiture, well-drafted agreements may require sale proceeds to be allocated toward earnout obligations or performance targets to be adjusted to reflect the reduced scope of the business.

Force majeure events - like natural disasters, regulatory changes, or market disruptions - should also be accounted for. Contracts should specify whether such events pause the earnout measurement period, adjust performance targets, or trigger alternative calculation methods.

Finally, bankruptcy protection for earnout obligations is crucial. Since earnout payments are considered contingent liabilities, they may be treated differently in bankruptcy proceedings. Including provisions that elevate earnout claims or establish alternative security mechanisms can protect the seller’s interests.

As courts continue to interpret new business scenarios, the legal framework for earnouts evolves. Collaborating with experienced legal counsel ensures agreements align with current standards while safeguarding the interests of both parties. These legal considerations also influence the financial structuring of earnouts, ensuring performance thresholds are met as agreed.

Financial Structure and Tax Impact

Earnout agreements require a solid financial framework that ties together payment terms, performance goals, and tax considerations. When structured effectively, they can align the financial interests of buyers and sellers while adhering to U.S. tax regulations.

Common Earnout Structures

In mid-market deals ranging from $5 million to $50 million, earnouts often account for 10% to 25% of the total purchase price. However, this percentage can vary significantly by industry. For instance, life sciences transactions frequently allocate around 61% of the total deal value to earnouts.

Earnouts can take several forms:

• Fixed percentage models: Payments are tied to a set percentage of performance outcomes.
• Tiered models: Payments increase as higher performance milestones are achieved.
• Milestone-based models: Payments are triggered by specific events, such as gaining regulatory approval, securing a major client, or launching a new product.

Most earnout periods last about 24 months, but in industries like life sciences, they often extend to three to five years to align with longer development cycles. Payments can be made periodically or as a lump sum at the end of the earnout period. These structures provide the foundation for defining performance metrics.

Defining Performance Metrics

The success of an earnout often hinges on clear performance metrics. Common targets include revenue, earnings, or EBITDA.

• Revenue-based earnouts: These are popular with sellers because they avoid adjustments tied to costs or accounting practices. For instance, an agreement might specify that the seller earns additional payments for every dollar of revenue exceeding a set threshold. It’s also common to outline how different revenue streams, like subscriptions versus one-time fees, are treated.
• EBITDA-based earnouts: Buyers often prefer these metrics because they reflect operational efficiency and profitability. However, the agreement must clearly define what expenses are excluded and how one-off costs are handled.

Other metrics might focus on customer retention, especially for service-oriented businesses, or operational milestones like patent approvals, user acquisition, or market expansion. The key is to ensure all measures are well-defined, objectively measurable, and reasonably within the seller’s control during the earnout period. Once metrics are established, the tax implications come into play.

Tax Implications of Earnouts in the U.S.

Tax treatment is a critical component of earnout agreements, shaping how payments are structured and classified. Payments tied to the contingent purchase price are generally treated as capital gains and may qualify for installment sale treatment. However, if the seller provides services during the earnout period, a portion of the payments might be classified as ordinary income, subject to employment taxes.

For buyers, earnout payments are usually considered part of the purchase price and not deductible as business expenses. Instead, they typically increase the buyer’s basis in the acquired assets, which could allow for future depreciation or amortization deductions.

Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code adds another layer of complexity when earnout payments are categorized as deferred compensation. This is especially relevant if the seller remains employed by the buyer during the earnout period. Additionally, state tax laws can vary, with some jurisdictions requiring immediate tax recognition if installment sale treatment is not permitted.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act has further influenced how earnout payments are classified and taxed. This underscores the importance of detailed documentation and collaboration among legal, financial, and tax professionals to avoid pitfalls and ensure compliance.

"An earn-out often converts today's disagreement over price into tomorrow's litigation over the outcome." - Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster, Delaware Court of Chancery

This insight underscores why careful financial planning and tax strategy are essential for creating earnout agreements that balance the interests of both parties while minimizing the risk of future disputes.

sbb-itb-97ecd51

Matching Earnouts with Business Goals

For an earnout agreement to truly succeed, its terms must align closely with the strategic goals of both the buyer and the seller. This alignment creates a structure where both parties are incentivized to work toward sustained growth and mutual success.

Setting Achievable Performance Targets

The foundation of any effective earnout agreement lies in setting realistic performance targets. If the goals are overly ambitious, sellers may feel disheartened; on the flip side, setting the bar too low can diminish the motivation to push for growth. To strike the right balance, use historical performance data, current market conditions, and industry benchmarks as guides. This ensures the targets represent meaningful yet attainable improvements over past results.

It’s equally important to factor in external influences, such as shifts in the economy, changes in regulations, or unexpected market disruptions, which could impact performance. Clearly documenting the business’s current state provides a reliable baseline for evaluating progress during the earnout period. These well-defined and measurable targets help maintain focus and drive motivation, ensuring that both parties stay aligned on long-term goals.

Motivating Post-Closing Performance

Once clear targets are in place, the next step is ensuring the seller remains engaged and motivated after the deal closes. Balancing the seller’s autonomy with the buyer’s strategic vision is key to achieving this. Many earnout agreements include incentives like management retention bonuses tied directly to performance outcomes. These mechanisms help retain key team members and keep everyone working toward the agreed objectives.

To minimize disruptions, it’s often best to delay significant operational changes until the earnout period concludes. Regular progress reviews and milestone-based payments can help track performance and maintain commitment to the targets. Buyers can further support earnout success by providing necessary resources, maintaining critical customer relationships, and avoiding changes that could destabilize the business. When these elements are in place, the chances of achieving strong, long-term results increase dramatically.

Common Problems and Risk Management

Earnout agreements can be tricky to navigate, with various challenges potentially throwing them off track. Taking proactive steps early on can help both buyers and sellers avoid common pitfalls. Managing these risks is key to keeping earnout structures aligned with the legal and financial frameworks discussed earlier.

Common Dispute Sources

One of the biggest culprits in earnout disputes is ambiguous contract language. For example, terms like "revenue" or "EBITDA" often lack clear definitions, leading to arguments over issues like one-time charges, currency changes, or material adverse events.

Sellers also worry about financial manipulation. They may suspect buyers of artificially lowering earnout payments by reallocating costs to the acquired business, delaying customer payments, or tweaking accounting practices in ways that negatively impact performance metrics.

Operational changes can further complicate things. Major shifts - such as sales team restructuring, system upgrades, or changes to product offerings - can interfere with hitting agreed-upon earnout targets.

Timing can also be a sticking point. Buyers often push for quick integration to realize synergies, while sellers might prefer keeping things steady until earnout payments are finalized. This clash can lead to disagreements over decisions about staffing, technology, and other operational factors.

Risk Management Methods

The good news? There are ways to manage these risks and keep disputes at bay.

1. Clear Contract Terms

A well-drafted contract is your best defense. Earnout agreements should spell out exactly how performance metrics will be calculated. This includes detailing accounting methods, adjustment processes, and how to handle unusual events that could impact results.

2. Independent Audits

Bringing in a neutral third party to oversee earnout calculations can build trust. Many agreements require independent accountants to verify performance metrics, with both parties having access to the necessary financial records. Escrow accounts or separate accounting records for the acquired business can also add an extra layer of protection.

3. Operational Covenants

These provisions safeguard the seller’s ability to meet earnout targets. For instance, they might limit the buyer’s ability to make major changes without the seller’s approval, require key personnel to stay on board during the earnout period, or mandate minimum investment levels to keep the business running smoothly.

4. Dispute Resolution Mechanisms

Instead of heading straight to expensive litigation, many agreements include structured processes for resolving disagreements. Mediation, binding arbitration, or expert determination by an industry specialist can help settle disputes quickly and cost-effectively.

5. Performance Adjustment Clauses

These clauses account for factors beyond either party’s control. For example, if market conditions or regulatory changes significantly impact the business, targets can be adjusted to reflect the new reality. This reduces the chances of disputes when unexpected events occur.

Risk and Mitigation Comparison

Here’s a quick look at common risks and how to address them:

Risk Category	Specific Risk	Mitigation Strategy	Implementation Details
Financial	Revenue manipulation	Independent accounting oversight	Third-party CPA reviews books monthly with full access.
Financial	Disputed EBITDA calculations	Clear accounting standards	Pre-agreed rules for handling extraordinary items.
Operational	Key employee departures	Retention agreements	Bonuses tied to earnout targets; non-compete clauses.
Operational	System integration disruption	Operational covenants	Buyer must get approval for major IT or process changes.
Legal	Contract interpretation issues	Expert determination clause	Industry specialist resolves disputes promptly.
Legal	Performance measurement issues	Escrow-backed calculations	Neutral accountant’s results backed by escrow funds.
Market	Economic downturn impact	Adjustment mechanisms	Targets adjusted using industry-wide benchmarks.
Market	Regulatory changes	Force majeure provisions	Targets automatically adjusted for compliance costs.

The most effective earnout agreements don’t rely on just one or two strategies - they layer multiple safeguards. This redundancy ensures fair outcomes even if some measures fall short.

Finally, regular communication between buyers and sellers is critical. Monthly performance reviews, quarterly updates, and periodic assessments can help catch potential problems early. By working together to address issues as they arise, both parties can avoid costly disputes and keep the earnout process on track.

Conclusion

Earnout agreements play a critical role in bridging valuation gaps in mergers and acquisitions, especially when carefully planned and executed. With earnouts featuring in nearly 30% of M&A transactions - most commonly in private deals under $250 million - knowing how to structure them effectively has become an important skill for both buyers and sellers.

As highlighted earlier, clear and precise documentation is absolutely essential. Vague contract terms often lead to costly disputes, but these can be avoided with well-defined metrics and calculation methods. For example, performance measures like "revenue" or "EBITDA" must include specific parameters to prevent misunderstandings that could result in financial surprises or prolonged legal battles.

Creating alignment between buyers and sellers goes beyond simply setting performance targets. It requires designing incentive structures that encourage genuine, sustainable business growth rather than short-term gains. The best earnouts rely on objective, verifiable metrics linked to realistic goals, ensuring post-closing management remains motivated while protecting the interests of both parties.

Risk management should be woven into the agreement through measures like independent audits, clear operational covenants, and structured dispute resolution mechanisms. Tools such as escrow accounts and expert determination clauses can provide additional safeguards to address potential conflicts effectively.

Tax considerations also play a significant role in earnout agreements. The U.S. tax treatment of earnout payments depends on whether the amounts are ascertainable at closing, making proper documentation crucial for compliance and achieving favorable outcomes for both sides.

FAQs

How do earnout agreements benefit both buyers and sellers in mergers and acquisitions?

Earnout agreements offer a practical way to align the interests of buyers and sellers by tying part of the purchase price to how well the business performs in the future. For sellers, this setup encourages ongoing involvement in the company's success even after the deal is finalized, leading to a smoother handover and shared objectives.

From the buyer's perspective, earnouts are a smart way to reduce financial risk. By making a portion of the payment dependent on hitting specific performance goals, buyers can avoid overpaying while motivating sellers to achieve those targets. This balance benefits both sides, creating a mutually advantageous arrangement.

What legal challenges are common in earnout agreements, and how can they be avoided?

Earnout agreements often run into legal snags, such as disagreements over how performance metrics are calculated, unclear contract language, or claims of misrepresentation or fraud during negotiations. These conflicts can escalate quickly, leading to expensive disputes or even court battles.

To steer clear of these pitfalls, it’s essential to establish performance metrics that are clear, measurable, and leave no room for debate. Contracts should also use specific and well-defined language to outline terms and expectations. Taking the time to carefully structure the legal framework and include detailed provisions can help both parties stay aligned, minimizing the chances of conflict and making the agreement easier to implement.

How do earnout agreements impact the tax obligations of buyers and sellers?

Earnout agreements can have a big impact on tax obligations, depending on how the payments are classified. If the earnout is considered part of the purchase price, it’s usually taxed as capital gains. This is often favorable for sellers since capital gains are taxed at lower rates - typically 15% or 20%, with an additional 3.8% net investment income tax possibly applying. However, if the earnout is treated as compensation for services, it’s taxed as ordinary income, which generally comes with higher rates.

The way the earnout is structured and the terms outlined in the agreement play a key role in determining these tax outcomes. Both buyers and sellers need to carefully assess the tax implications during negotiations to ensure the arrangement aligns with their financial goals and avoids any unexpected tax burdens.

Related Blog Posts

• 5 Earnout Structures for SMB Acquisitions
• Checklist for Avoiding Earnout Agreement Issues
• Legal Remedies for Earnout Breaches in M&A
• Earnout Payment Terms: Key Clauses Explained